Here's a thought exercise that just occurred to me. When would the first - if ever - IAT be that featured no turbojets at all, just turbofans (and other engine options) of some description - up to you whether you include attending classic jets or not? Has there ever even been one?
I suppose you'd have to narrow it down to years that B-52s never attended, which are few.
The first (R)IAT without any turbojets
The first (R)IAT without any turbojets
Twitter: @samwise24 | Flickr: samwise24 | Shamelessly copying LN Strike Eagle's avatar ideas since 2016
- capercaillie
- Posts: 9384
- Joined: Mon 01 Sep 2008, 3:04 pm
- Location: Leominster
Re: The first (R)IAT without any turbojets
B-52Hs have turbofans? We haven't had a G since about 1992ish.
With aircraft like Jet Provosts and MB339s attending almost annually, probably never happened.
Don't worry only 27 minutes to go.
With aircraft like Jet Provosts and MB339s attending almost annually, probably never happened.
Don't worry only 27 minutes to go.
Re: The first (R)IAT without any turbojets
capercaillie wrote:B-52Hs have turbofans? We haven't had a G since about 1992ish.
Shows what I know, huh.
But if you discount classic jets (JPs) and just restrict to aircraft in service.
Twitter: @samwise24 | Flickr: samwise24 | Shamelessly copying LN Strike Eagle's avatar ideas since 2016
- Paul_Reflex
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Sat 31 Dec 2011, 10:31 am
Re: The first (R)IAT without any turbojets
The bypass ratio of power plants is certainly a novel topic of conversation with respect to RIAT participation!
I can't think of any occasions where this has happened.
I can't think of any occasions where this has happened.
- Wrexham Mackem
- UKAR Staff
- Posts: 2518
- Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2008, 4:46 pm
- Location: Farndon, Chester
Re: The first (R)IAT without any turbojets
I think this thread proves that time is dragging for Sam as much as for me, and most of us proabably. I feel like all the clocks in the house are going at half speed. It seems a shame to wish my life away, but roll on next week.!
For what its worth Sam, I don't think we've had turbojet-less RIAT yet, no.
For what its worth Sam, I don't think we've had turbojet-less RIAT yet, no.