Save the Skymaster
- Dan O'Hagan
- Posts: 2279
- Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2016, 6:05 pm
Re: Save the Skymaster
If UKHAT succeeds in buying, restoring and flying anything, I will be amazed. I've not seen one scintilla of evidence which suggests credibility.
Re: Save the Skymaster
All these rtf projects remind me of 1 thing, those magazines you buy such as "build the Titanic". At first you are really excited by it and it seems plausible and affordable at 99p for the first issue. Then the second issue is £1.99 and in 3 months time the issues are £9.99 each. You invest hundreds of pounds into this project and at the 6 month (halfway marker) the company vanishes into thin air. You lose all your 'invested' money and have a load of junk to show for it.
If I am putting my hard earned into a return to flight project I want a professional organisation, people who listen and engage with their supporters and donaters and I want a team of people on hand for whatever they are needed for, technicians, ground grew, pilots etc I want all that in place for when they're needed. I want a solid and confident projection over what is needed, what will happen, when, where, how much and what happens next. I want to know how my money is being spent, breakdowns and percentages of where it's going. Honesty, that's the biggest one. I currently donate to 1 company/project and that is Fly Navy/Sea Vixen. I know that 'civil' trusts will certainly have a harder time than those such as Fly Navy but that doesn't mean they have to be any less professional or organised about it!
When I read statements such as "commercial in confidence" it just reminds me of airshow participation threads with comments such as, "I know what's coming, but I can't tell you", which usually turns out to be a load of balls anyway!
If I am putting my hard earned into a return to flight project I want a professional organisation, people who listen and engage with their supporters and donaters and I want a team of people on hand for whatever they are needed for, technicians, ground grew, pilots etc I want all that in place for when they're needed. I want a solid and confident projection over what is needed, what will happen, when, where, how much and what happens next. I want to know how my money is being spent, breakdowns and percentages of where it's going. Honesty, that's the biggest one. I currently donate to 1 company/project and that is Fly Navy/Sea Vixen. I know that 'civil' trusts will certainly have a harder time than those such as Fly Navy but that doesn't mean they have to be any less professional or organised about it!
When I read statements such as "commercial in confidence" it just reminds me of airshow participation threads with comments such as, "I know what's coming, but I can't tell you", which usually turns out to be a load of balls anyway!
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon 13 Mar 2017, 2:24 pm
Re: Save the Skymaster
[/quote]
Nigel, what I think is ludicrous is that you run a campaign asking for £80,000 in donations but genuine questions are answered with the reply 'commercial in confidence'.... I also think it's ludicrous that you still refer to yourself as a trust when you know full well that you aren't a trust (unless you can now confirm that you have been granted trust status?)...
Are you able to give us the names and backgrounds of the people behind this project? People aren't going to donate until they know this sort of information![/quote]
I certainly wouldn't expect anyone to donate to a cause that wasn't both clear in it's aims and transparent with regard to its set up. The information you are requesting will be made public knowledge once we have finalised elements of our infrastructure. Until we have made a formal announcement I would be sorely misguided if I were to expect any donations, that would be ludicrous. A lot of work is continuing behind the scenes and I will make an announcement in due course.
Nigel Powton
UKHAT
Nigel, what I think is ludicrous is that you run a campaign asking for £80,000 in donations but genuine questions are answered with the reply 'commercial in confidence'.... I also think it's ludicrous that you still refer to yourself as a trust when you know full well that you aren't a trust (unless you can now confirm that you have been granted trust status?)...
Are you able to give us the names and backgrounds of the people behind this project? People aren't going to donate until they know this sort of information![/quote]
I certainly wouldn't expect anyone to donate to a cause that wasn't both clear in it's aims and transparent with regard to its set up. The information you are requesting will be made public knowledge once we have finalised elements of our infrastructure. Until we have made a formal announcement I would be sorely misguided if I were to expect any donations, that would be ludicrous. A lot of work is continuing behind the scenes and I will make an announcement in due course.
Nigel Powton
UKHAT
UK Heritage Aviation Trust
For enquiries, please email enquiries@ukhat.org
For enquiries, please email enquiries@ukhat.org
Re: Save the Skymaster
Maybe it's just me and/or now looking in from the other side these days, but these endless fundraising appeals are relentless and quite boring too. It feels like the hobby is being swamped with all sorts of restoration bids. Sure, some are extremely worthy, like Just Jane and the Shack at Coventry and nobody is forcing anyone to donate.
Each to their own of course, but is it just me?
Each to their own of course, but is it just me?
Re: Save the Skymaster
Well I would love an overall body/trust that attracted sponsorship/fundraising efforts and expertise that could be shared around agreed projects. Some airworthy, some not, some longer term some shorter but with a close look at the importance each project to to Uk aviation heritage. It will never happen. There's also no reason why people should not pursue there own 'pet' projects. Better someone attempt it than let it rot without trying some of them may come off - good luck to them all, no one is forcing anyone to donate.
- Dan O'Hagan
- Posts: 2279
- Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2016, 6:05 pm
Re: Save the Skymaster
Asking for money to buy something just makes an outfit look rank amateur. What happens to the money if the target isn't raised? Who actually owns the aeroplane? Where does the money being raised actually go?
And, in UKHAT's case, where's the due diligence? Until recently we've had two Vampires on the circuit, the VPG's WZ507 and the (Air Atlantique?) camoflaged example. Neither was ever especially busy with bookings. Where's the proof that there's a market for it? Classic jets are, in the eyes of the media, toxic since Shoreham. Do people care enough about a Vampire, when VTTS had to mothball a far more impressive beast WK163 because the donations were barely a trickle.
Until UKHAT own an aeroplane, and are a bona-fide charity or trust, they will be viewed as Mickey Mouse at best, shysters and chancers at worst.
And, in UKHAT's case, where's the due diligence? Until recently we've had two Vampires on the circuit, the VPG's WZ507 and the (Air Atlantique?) camoflaged example. Neither was ever especially busy with bookings. Where's the proof that there's a market for it? Classic jets are, in the eyes of the media, toxic since Shoreham. Do people care enough about a Vampire, when VTTS had to mothball a far more impressive beast WK163 because the donations were barely a trickle.
Until UKHAT own an aeroplane, and are a bona-fide charity or trust, they will be viewed as Mickey Mouse at best, shysters and chancers at worst.
Re: Save the Skymaster
Interesting points raised by many on here - some of which get answers and some of which are clearly dodged around. One thing I'd be very interested to know - what, as Dan asks, exactly would happen to my money if I donated but no aircraft was purchased and the whole thing goes belly up? Is it the same for any donation to anything charitable?
Genuine question, I'm not stirring.
Genuine question, I'm not stirring.
Buy the sky and sell the sky and lift your arms up to the sky and ask the sky"
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue 28 Feb 2017, 4:34 pm
Re: Save the Skymaster
CJS wrote:Interesting points raised by many on here - some of which get answers and some of which are clearly dodged around. One thing I'd be very interested to know - what, as Dan asks, exactly would happen to my money if I donated but no aircraft was purchased and the whole thing goes belly up? Is it the same for any donation to anything charitable?
Genuine question, I'm not stirring.
Having worked with other organisations using the likes of crowd funding etc if target funds are not raised before the end of a campaign then they can/should be refunded to the donor. This is a automatic thing under the crowd funding rules.
Say they get organised and become a registered charity and are selling merchandise etc. Then like any other charity there is always a risk that things could go wrong? They should have an accountant to oversee their books, 4 signatures on the bank account.
I would say in their defence if your not happy with them don't donate. Why sit behind a key board and slag them off
Re: Save the Skymaster
Vampire 1973 wrote:Why sit behind a key board and slag them off
Well some people take positive action while the best some others can do is just that...
Re: Save the Skymaster
I wasn't slagging anyone off, there are important unanswered questions around lots of these projects - I don't know what you expect us to do, not keep asking them or something?
Buy the sky and sell the sky and lift your arms up to the sky and ask the sky"
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Mon 02 May 2016, 3:10 pm
Re: Save the Skymaster
Dan O'Hagan wrote:If UKHAT succeeds in buying, restoring and flying anything, I will be amazed. I've not seen one scintilla of evidence which suggests credibility.
Did you miss the big announcement this week, UKHAT now have an "official" twitter account, all well and good but if its as wishy washy as the Facebook account it might be best not to bother.
Re: Save the Skymaster
[fb-post]https://m.facebook.com/savetheskymaster/photos/a.1035198379855493.1073741829.1032605426781455/1570854582956534/?type=3[/fb-post]
If life gives you melons then you're probably dyslexic
Re: Save the Skymaster
Good Luck! and power to your pockets & elbows!
-
- Posts: 911
- Joined: Mon 08 Sep 2008, 7:25 pm
Re: Save the Skymaster
You can take this two ways.
The good news it the Skymaster in now owned by a group that have ambitions to save it and avoid it going the same way as its sister did at North Weald.
On the flip side, there is the view that maybe the previous owner saw no value in it and now the airframe, its upkeep and, in the worst case, its disposal is now someone else's problem. The question I ask them is what do they intend to do with it? After all, another American 4 engined piston struggles to survive over here with bags more charisma, historic and sentimental value. Unless they can find a way for it to pay for itself I find it difficult to see.
The good news it the Skymaster in now owned by a group that have ambitions to save it and avoid it going the same way as its sister did at North Weald.
On the flip side, there is the view that maybe the previous owner saw no value in it and now the airframe, its upkeep and, in the worst case, its disposal is now someone else's problem. The question I ask them is what do they intend to do with it? After all, another American 4 engined piston struggles to survive over here with bags more charisma, historic and sentimental value. Unless they can find a way for it to pay for itself I find it difficult to see.
- Arthur Tee
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: Mon 15 Sep 2008, 12:42 pm
- Location: Shawbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire
Re: Save the Skymaster
How about a good 'cosmetic' restoration and 'weather-proof' - then display at the Cold War Musem Cosford? Other than a chunk of Berlin War - there is little else to illustrate the Airlift...
Arthur
Arthur
Canon PowerShot SX40HS - It's not what you've got - it's what you do with it!
-
- Posts: 830
- Joined: Wed 30 May 2012, 2:38 pm
Re: Save the Skymaster
Is this the same Skymaster that appear in Fairford all those years ago, If it is how come it did not travel back home and it languished in North Weald all this time?
Cheers
George
Zero shows for 2018 Giving in a Rest.
George
Zero shows for 2018 Giving in a Rest.
- Pen Pusher
- Posts: 7138
- Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2008, 6:34 pm
- Location: St Ives, Cambs
Re: Save the Skymaster
Arthur Tee wrote:then display at the Cold War Musem Cosford? Other than a chunk of Berlin War - there is little else to illustrate the Airlift...
Arthur
Apart from the Hastings, York, Dakota of course.
Brian
- spellow3010
- Posts: 616
- Joined: Wed 17 Sep 2014, 1:12 pm
Re: Save the Skymaster
Georgeconna wrote:Is this the same Skymaster that appear in Fairford all those years ago, If it is how come it did not travel back home and it languished in North Weald all this time?
1998 RIAT? Didn't the C-54 come from South Africa for the Berlin Airlift demo? And wasn't it a female co-pilot, in kind of a father-daughter combo? It's been a long time now. RIAT 1998 I remembered for the Berlin Airlift attempt, the 'Typhoon and Reds flypast' and a Super Etendard! Oh, and the MATS Connie.
Now officially qualifies as a 'regular' at Famous Dave's - El Centro
- LN Strike Eagle
- UKAR Staff
- Posts: 11191
- Joined: Mon 21 Jul 2008, 3:29 pm
Re: Save the Skymaster
Georgeconna wrote:Is this the same Skymaster that appear in Fairford all those years ago, If it is how come it did not travel back home and it languished in North Weald all this time?
It's one of a pair that were ferried to North Weald around 2004 for the filming of a movie about the Berlin Air Lift that never happened. The second airframe was scrapped in late 2015 - only the cockpit section and a few panels/parts remain, they're on display at the RAF Burtonwood Heritage Centre.
"You really are an oafish philistine at times!"
- Arthur Tee
- Posts: 1169
- Joined: Mon 15 Sep 2008, 12:42 pm
- Location: Shawbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire
Re: Save the Skymaster
Pen Pusher wrote:Arthur Tee wrote:then display at the Cold War Musem Cosford? Other than a chunk of Berlin War - there is little else to illustrate the Airlift...
Arthur
Apart from the Hastings, York, Dakota of course.
Brian
Thanks Brian!
Arthur
Canon PowerShot SX40HS - It's not what you've got - it's what you do with it!
Re: Save the Skymaster
Meh!... Everybody knows it was only American aircraft that re-supplied Berlin, haven't you seen pictures of the US 'Candy Bomber' in action?
Now you've spoilt it all, by perpetuating factual information Brian!
Now you've spoilt it all, by perpetuating factual information Brian!
Re: Save the Skymaster
spellow3010 wrote:Georgeconna wrote:Is this the same Skymaster that appear in Fairford all those years ago, If it is how come it did not travel back home and it languished in North Weald all this time?
1998 RIAT? Didn't the C-54 come from South Africa for the Berlin Airlift demo? And wasn't it a female co-pilot, in kind of a father-daughter combo? It's been a long time now. RIAT 1998 I remembered for the Berlin Airlift attempt, the 'Typhoon and Reds flypast' and a Super Etendard! Oh, and the MATS Connie.
This one also appeared at RIAT 98 as part of the Berlin airlift UK tour: https://www.flickr.com/photos/collingwo ... /lightbox/
Re: Save the Skymaster
GertrudetheMerciless wrote:You can take this two ways.
The good news it the Skymaster in now owned by a group that have ambitions to save it and avoid it going the same way as its sister did at North Weald.
On the flip side, there is the view that maybe the previous owner saw no value in it and now the airframe, its upkeep and, in the worst case, its disposal is now someone else's problem. The question I ask them is what do they intend to do with it? After all, another American 4 engined piston struggles to survive over here with bags more charisma, historic and sentimental value. Unless they can find a way for it to pay for itself I find it difficult to see.
Well its worth a shot, better to die trying than not try at all.
Canon 800D & Sigma 150-600 C
Dudley, West Midlands
Shows I'm Attending in 2020:
Well Um..
Dudley, West Midlands
Shows I'm Attending in 2020:
Well Um..
-
- Posts: 911
- Joined: Mon 08 Sep 2008, 7:25 pm
Re: Save the Skymaster
ColeTheDemolisher wrote:GertrudetheMerciless wrote:You can take this two ways.
The good news it the Skymaster in now owned by a group that have ambitions to save it and avoid it going the same way as its sister did at North Weald.
On the flip side, there is the view that maybe the previous owner saw no value in it and now the airframe, its upkeep and, in the worst case, its disposal is now someone else's problem. The question I ask them is what do they intend to do with it? After all, another American 4 engined piston struggles to survive over here with bags more charisma, historic and sentimental value. Unless they can find a way for it to pay for itself I find it difficult to see.
Well its worth a shot, better to die trying than not try at all.
I quite agree.
- capercaillie
- Posts: 9366
- Joined: Mon 01 Sep 2008, 3:04 pm
- Location: Leominster
Re: Save the Skymaster
Andover wrote:spellow3010 wrote:Georgeconna wrote:Is this the same Skymaster that appear in Fairford all those years ago, If it is how come it did not travel back home and it languished in North Weald all this time?
1998 RIAT? Didn't the C-54 come from South Africa for the Berlin Airlift demo? And wasn't it a female co-pilot, in kind of a father-daughter combo? It's been a long time now. RIAT 1998 I remembered for the Berlin Airlift attempt, the 'Typhoon and Reds flypast' and a Super Etendard! Oh, and the MATS Connie.
This one also appeared at RIAT 98 as part of the Berlin airlift UK tour: https://www.flickr.com/photos/collingwo ... /lightbox/
I don't think it was at RIAT 1998. The MATS Connie was there, along with South African Airways C-54 and Atlantic Airlines DC-6, I can only ever remember seeing that C-54 at Nellis, although it eventually arrived over here in 2004 for the 50th anniversary before they left them to rot.