Soft???

[G-CVIX]

Hello, just had this rejected from Airliners.net for being "soft". Don't really understand that as I thought that, if anything, it was slightly over-sharpened. What do you think?

http://www.airfighters.com/photo_25434.details.large

[AlexC]

Looks sharp enough to me. I've had several of Shorham on the Saturday rejected for 'soft' by A.net recently, and I don't think they were. They look just as sharp as recent uploads at least on my monitor. I've since printed some of them off, and they look far sharper then prints off negatives used to. Some A.net decisions still baffle me.

[FOTO4]

A.net should have gone to Specsavers comes to mind

[tom tiger]

Same here, sharp shot, pretty dang good shot No idea why they would call this soft.....

[Rob Leigh]

The front end looks soft to me, particularly the cockpit area.