Axalp that did not take place by sfw. FINAL UPDATE.

Axalp that did not take place by sfw. FINAL UPDATE.

Postby sfw on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 11:13 am

As some of you know, due to the bad weather this year's Axalp show was canceled. I was lucky that I was there in the days of rehearsals and was able to take these few shots and now I'm sharing them with you. :)


01.
Image

02.
Image

03.
Image

04.
Image

05.
Image

06.
Image

07.
Image

08.
Image

09.
Image

10.
Image


11.
Image

12.
Image

13.
Image

14.
Image

15.
Image
Last edited by sfw on Thu 17 Oct 2013, 4:50 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Andy

Power of the Lens
https://www.facebook.com/arogucki/photos_albums
User avatar
sfw

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby shaggy101 on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 11:18 am

Great set, number 7 is a brilliant shot :clap:
Dan,
User avatar
shaggy101

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby Maisie on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 11:36 am

Holy crap, number 4,10 & 14!! :worship: :worship: :worship:
6D | 7D | 60D
11-16 f/2.8 | 24-105 IS L | 70-300 IS USM | 50 f/1.4 | 100 f/2.8 | 400 f/5.6
Maisie

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby danighi on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 11:48 am

n.10 is incredible!!!! great andy!!!
danighi

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby BDL on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 12:01 pm

Maisie wrote:Holy crap, number 4,10 & 14!! :worship: :worship: :worship:


EXACTLY my words as well!

How 'bout a UKAR trip to Axalp in 2015?
Forget the EFL, it's all about the National League.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/bigdl2009/
User avatar
BDL

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby reheat module on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 12:13 pm

Excellent timing, composition and exposure, resulting in a simply stunning portfolio.
Canon systems
reheat module

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby Screechy on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 12:20 pm

13 and 14 for me in another sickening display of great photography. Respect sir :worship:
User avatar
Screechy

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby RichPittman on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 12:24 pm

Yes very nice indeed.

After trapseing up the wrong side for the light twice, If I ever went again it would have to be up this side.

Trouble is were still talking 400-600 mm aren't we?

Cheers Rich
Always remember "If you cannot turn tight...you cannot fight!"
User avatar
RichPittman
UKAR Staff

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby paullangford on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 12:33 pm

WOW. lovin no.7 and 11 especially

Paul
User avatar
paullangford

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby Tim Laurence on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 12:44 pm

Fantastic pictures! 10 and 14 are simply outstanding viewpoints.

Tim
User avatar
Tim Laurence

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby timuss on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 1:17 pm

Awesome indeed great set of shots all stunners!!!
Canon 7Dmk2
Canon 7D
Sigma 18-200
Sigma 10-20
Canon 100-400 L IS II
Icom ICR-2 Scanner
PSN: timuss
timuss

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby Maisie on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 1:22 pm

RichPittman wrote:Yes very nice indeed.

After trapseing up the wrong side for the light twice, If I ever went again it would have to be up this side.

Trouble is were still talking 400-600 mm aren't we?

Cheers Rich



I'm guessing he has a 1.4TC on the 500mm f/4, as the EXIF on a few I just looked at are 500mm or 700mm.
6D | 7D | 60D
11-16 f/2.8 | 24-105 IS L | 70-300 IS USM | 50 f/1.4 | 100 f/2.8 | 400 f/5.6
Maisie

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby bigcrow on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 1:30 pm

Outstanding... #7 & #14 are sublime... :rock:
User avatar
bigcrow

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby sfw on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 1:34 pm

RichPittman wrote:Yes very nice indeed.

After trapseing up the wrong side for the light twice, If I ever went again it would have to be up this side.

Trouble is were still talking 400-600 mm aren't we?

Cheers Rich

From the Wildgarst down is better to use long lens but 70-200mm will be enough for the face on approaches and all the over head flights can be done even with 50mm or wider.
Andy

Power of the Lens
https://www.facebook.com/arogucki/photos_albums
User avatar
sfw

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby Flare Path on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 3:32 pm

1, 3 and 10; simply the best.
Flare Path

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby Lee606 on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 3:39 pm

Amazing! :clap: :clap: :clap:
User avatar
Lee606

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby alinutza on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 5:13 pm

Wish I was there..nice job like always :)
my photos on Photoavia
User avatar
alinutza

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby F-86 on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 5:38 pm

Very very nice. :clap:
User avatar
F-86

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby CH2 on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 5:54 pm

Jesus Christ! :shock: :clap: :clap: :clap:
Cheers,

Chris
User avatar
CH2

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby Chucky on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 6:28 pm

Great set :clap: #1, 7 and 11 are my favourites.
User avatar
Chucky

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby Fleet flyer on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 6:58 pm

Simply stunning!! Stunning! Stunning set of images. Like 5,10 and 14 the best. :clap:
To rule the waves, rule the skies first. Fleet Flyer
https://www.flickr.com/photos/93306768@N03/
User avatar
Fleet flyer

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby Yakub on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 7:42 pm

I like numer one-four.
Yakub
User avatar
Yakub


Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby Skyguide on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 8:39 pm

:worship: :worship: :worship: :worship: :worship: :worship:
Great set there!!

Did you see the bullett in No. 5?? :rock:
User avatar
Skyguide

Re: Axalp that did not take place by sfw.

Postby Toetapper on Mon 14 Oct 2013, 8:55 pm

Awesome set, just fantastic ....4,10 and 14 are my favourites :worship:
User avatar
Toetapper

Next

Return to Airshow Photos

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: brovarsky, sunwing and 19 guests