Dragon Rapide wrote:So I conclude from that that that were the whip to be banned so that no rider was disadvantaged races would be raced and horses and riders would win or lose, as they do now.
Which begs two questions - why have the whip in the first place and why not ban it altogether? Who benefits from its use? Not the horse, I presume.

Dragon Rapide wrote:Mmmm - same as nearly every other sport now - MONEY at the root of it!!

Abingdonman wrote:Dragon Rapide wrote:Mmmm - same as nearly every other sport now - MONEY at the root of it!!
Well you see,for striking his horse 6 times in the last furlong,instead of the permitted 5, a jockey lost his win percentage and riding fee on Saturday at Ascot....a cool £55,000!![]()
so,he'll be appealing for sure

Eelmoor wrote:Abingdonman wrote:Dragon Rapide wrote:Mmmm - same as nearly every other sport now - MONEY at the root of it!!
Well you see,for striking his horse 6 times in the last furlong,instead of the permitted 5, a jockey lost his win percentage and riding fee on Saturday at Ascot....a cool £55,000!![]()
so,he'll be appealing for sure
Bet he wished he had paid more attention in Maths while at school, he would of been able to count then


Eelmoor wrote:Whats complicated about 2 times before the last furlong and 5 after ???



Eelmoor wrote:If the much malighned players in the Football association can understand the offside rule, it doesnt say much for the jockeys does it ??
Abingdonman wrote:Eelmoor wrote:If the much malighned players in the Football association can understand the offside rule, it doesnt say much for the jockeys does it ??
Someone understand's the offside rule? ...you could have fooled me![]()
I remember the confusion in football when they first banned barging the goalie to force the ball in the net somehow.... saw it happen once or twice,football was MUCH more fun then!
they learnt and adapted, or most did, and those that didnt found they were no longer needed in a team that kept conceeding free kicks due to their misinterpritation of the new rules 
aceyone wrote:Am I right in thinking that no whip is used in show jumping/eventing such as Hickstead ? if so the horses seem to manage over much higher and iffier jumps etc without being " painfully persuaded "

Thumper wrote:aceyone wrote:Am I right in thinking that no whip is used in show jumping/eventing such as Hickstead ? if so the horses seem to manage over much higher and iffier jumps etc without being " painfully persuaded "
Whips are used in show jumping and eventing by many riders, spurs are commonplace as well which is something you don't see in racing.
A few years ago a show jumper competing at Hickstead literally beat his horse around the head repeatedly with his whip after the horse refused a jump. He was fined and banned from competing for several months. It was a live broadcast and it was a disgusting thing to watch and caused outrage.
Most recently in the news was Prince Harry for excessive use of his spurs on his Polo pony which left the pony with 2 bloody "holes" in his flank. No action was taken against him.
Users browsing this forum: DerekF, Harry_Imp, Mictheslik, Robin, shaggy101, slickfonzy, timuss, Toonman, uk-ian and 8 guests