RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby lambo17841 on Wed 18 Apr 2012, 7:08 pm

Report in todays D/M states RAF are looking at buying RC-135 to replace Nimrod,nothing like being up to date with a story as this was announced ages ago and RAF crews have been training on the replacements for ages!

John
lambo17841


Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby stonesfan on Wed 18 Apr 2012, 10:19 pm

Does anyone know what airframes are going to be used and when they originally entered service as a 707? I would have thought the Daily Mail would have had a field day with the potential headlines there :lol:

'RAF orders in 40 year old aircraft as austerity cuts hit home'......
stonesfan

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby FGR2 on Wed 18 Apr 2012, 10:31 pm

Aren't they going to be nearer 50 years old when we get them. They are the last of the KC-135 tankers that were built, that are being converted to RC-135 spec.
FGR2

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby stonesfan on Wed 18 Apr 2012, 10:55 pm

FGR2 wrote:Aren't they going to be nearer 50 years old when we get them. They are the last of the KC-135 tankers that were built, that are being converted to RC-135 spec.


Ahh, so these entered service as a 135 rather than a 707? We're these originally designated Boeing 717?
stonesfan

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby Unknown74 on Wed 18 Apr 2012, 10:56 pm

Would a Sentinal type of Aircraft not be better than the RC-135?
Unknown74

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby stratocaster on Thu 19 Apr 2012, 8:45 am

I'd have thought the Nimrod replacement was going to be an Airbus military built airframe? :dunno:
Planes?,PLANES?!! WE'VE got plenty of planes!
stratocaster

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby Russ on Thu 19 Apr 2012, 8:52 am

I guess the RC-135 is the "low risk" and more affordable option. Can all the relevant gear fit into the Sentinel airframe? Questionable. Similarly to an Airbus design, it would all need to be tested, which would take time and money. What we do know is that the RC-135 gear (including airframe) is proven and does do the job.
Ma-Ma is not the law... I am the law.
User avatar
Russ
UKAR Staff

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby Kenny on Thu 19 Apr 2012, 9:04 am

So when we get these, will we lose the Sentinel?
AirForces Monthly - web content editor

https://www.facebook.com/AirForcesMonthly
User avatar
Kenny

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby Kenny on Thu 19 Apr 2012, 9:06 am

Russ wrote:What we do know is that the RC-135 gear (including airframe) is proven and does do the job.

Plus the commonality with the 707 airframe, will the pilots be able to cover the other, i.e RC-135 fill in for E-3D and vice versa?
AirForces Monthly - web content editor

https://www.facebook.com/AirForcesMonthly
User avatar
Kenny

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby Russ on Thu 19 Apr 2012, 9:17 am

Kenny wrote:So when we get these, will we lose the Sentinel?

Different roles Kenny, although they are both ISTAR platforms.

Sentinel fleet is scheduled to (stupidly) be retired once we're done in Afghanistan. Although there's some speculation because of it's usefulness in Libya that decision could be revoked.
Ma-Ma is not the law... I am the law.
User avatar
Russ
UKAR Staff

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby capercaillie on Thu 19 Apr 2012, 9:24 am

Kenny wrote:
Russ wrote:What we do know is that the RC-135 gear (including airframe) is proven and does do the job.

Plus the commonality with the 707 airframe, will the pilots be able to cover the other, i.e RC-135 fill in for E-3D and vice versa?


A 707 is not a C-135, different aircraft that shared a common aerodynamic prototype.
Today's number is the number two! I have two vings and I have two fangs to bite you.
User avatar
capercaillie

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby Kenny on Thu 19 Apr 2012, 9:30 am

So are the flight decks completely different to each other then? :question:
AirForces Monthly - web content editor

https://www.facebook.com/AirForcesMonthly
User avatar
Kenny

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby capercaillie on Thu 19 Apr 2012, 10:03 am

Kenny wrote:So are the flight decks completely different to each other then? :question:


http://www.aero-news.net/images/content/military/2010/USAF-RC135-RivetJoint-0810a.jpg

http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/middle/8/1/0/1815018.jpg


Lots of knobs and dials and buttons and stick things but some differences. :smile: Rivet Joint first, Sentry second.
Today's number is the number two! I have two vings and I have two fangs to bite you.
User avatar
capercaillie

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby Kenny on Thu 19 Apr 2012, 10:14 am

I just presumed it'd be the same type rating (or whatever the military call it)
AirForces Monthly - web content editor

https://www.facebook.com/AirForcesMonthly
User avatar
Kenny

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby Kip Casper on Thu 19 Apr 2012, 11:04 am

Unknown74 wrote:Would a Sentinal type of Aircraft not be better than the RC-135?


Funny you should mention that:

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articl ... r1-370715/
http://www.gcse.com/english/there.htm - learn how to use 'their', 'there' and 'they're'.
Kip Casper

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby Wes_Howes on Thu 19 Apr 2012, 11:23 am

Would the Sentinals not be useful to fulfill the MRA role vacated by the Nimrod? At least until P-8 is chosen as a replacement :wink: Obviously some of the equipment will need to be altered but still, if they can do it over land, they can do it over water surely? :dunno:
User avatar
Wes_Howes

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby iainpeden on Thu 19 Apr 2012, 12:09 pm

They do not have the capacity to drop flares or rescue equipment; however as a command aircraft I assume they could do a good job.
Last edited by iainpeden on Thu 19 Apr 2012, 6:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
iainpeden

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby DanO1978 on Thu 19 Apr 2012, 1:13 pm

To clarify the spelling - Sentinel, NOT Sentinal.
The name's Smythe. James St. John Smythe.
User avatar
DanO1978
UKAR Staff

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby Last Lightning on Sat 21 Apr 2012, 4:54 am

stonesfan wrote:Does anyone know what airframes are going to be used


ZZ664----KC-135R 64-14833
ZZ665----KC-135R 64-14838
ZZ666----KC-135R 64-14830
User avatar
Last Lightning

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby parsley on Sat 21 Apr 2012, 6:04 am

Wes_Howes wrote:Would the Sentinals not be useful to fulfill the MRA role vacated by the Nimrod? At least until P-8 is chosen as a replacement :wink: Obviously some of the equipment will need to be altered but still, if they can do it over land, they can do it over water surely? :dunno:



The cynical part of me sees a low cost replacement for the Nimrod with the Sentinels and Shadows especially as Raytheon are touting maritime patrol as a possible future role...hey look voter not only do we have a replacement for the Nimrod but more aircraft than we would have had Nimrods
parsley
UKAR Supporter

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby Arthur Tee on Sat 21 Apr 2012, 9:22 am

Last Lightning wrote:
stonesfan wrote:Does anyone know what airframes are going to be used


ZZ664----KC-135R 64-14833
ZZ665----KC-135R 64-14838
ZZ666----KC-135R 64-14830


First flight dates according to Taxiwayalpha.com are:

ZZ664 29th October 1964
ZZ665 11th December 1964
ZZ666 12th October 1964

Boeing certainly didn't hang around in those days when it came to pushing airframes off the production line!

Arthur
Canon PowerShot SX40HS - It's not what you've got - it's what you do with it!
User avatar
Arthur Tee

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby Orion on Sat 21 Apr 2012, 9:28 am

Kip Casper wrote:
Unknown74 wrote:Would a Sentinal type of Aircraft not be better than the RC-135?


Funny you should mention that:

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articl ... r1-370715/


Yes, I noticed this too. IWHT that this would make an excellent choice for surveillance for the time being. After all there isn't an immediate military threat to Britain.

Regards
David Mylchreest
Orion

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby Wes_Howes on Sat 21 Apr 2012, 10:31 am

Orion wrote: After all there isn't an immediate military threat to Britain.


In reality, has there been or will there ever be a significant military threat, since the Berlin Wall came down? I can't see war happening on a Global scale, certainly not in my life time, unless of course we do use up all the natural resources. But then we wouldn't be able to fight it anyway :grin:
User avatar
Wes_Howes

Re: RAF RC-135 article in Daily Mail

Postby JBartlett on Tue 24 Apr 2012, 10:34 pm

iainpeden wrote:They do not have the capacity to drop flares or rescue equipment; however as a command aircraft I assume they could do a good job.


Might not have the capacity to drop flares or rescue equipment but it could do what Paul Francis said below.

Paul Francis, Raytheon UK's head of airborne solutions, says the Sentinel's dual-mode radar could also possibly be given software-based changes to enable it to provide a maritime patrol capability to search for, track and identify surface vessels.
and the same about the Shadow R1
If retained long-term, the type could possibly also provide a maritime patrol capability by being equipped with Raytheon's SeaVue radar, Francis says
. that link Kip casper posted is quite interesting hope that happens to both aircraft, just think its stupid to retire good worthy aircraft.


Cheers
James.
RIP Red 4, Flight Lieutenant Jon Egging 1978 - 2011
RIP Red 5, Flight Lieutenant Sean Cunningham
JBartlett


Return to Aviation Waffle

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 81TFW, andrew653, DeltaPapa, Google [Bot], Graf Zeppelin and 18 guests