F1 2012

Re: F1 2012

Postby A40-BP on Sun 13 May 2012, 2:45 pm

All hail the Pastor-bator! Stunning drive. Best Spanish GP for a number of years!

7
With dumb bombs and retarded bomblets, why don't they just use stupid missiles?
User avatar
A40-BP

Re: F1 2012

Postby Tonka 617 on Sun 13 May 2012, 3:17 pm

Yet another brilliant race! What a drive by Pastor holding of Alonso in the closing stages
User avatar
Tonka 617

Re: F1 2012

Postby ianf on Sun 13 May 2012, 5:40 pm

A great race with another new winner unfortunatly there has been a fire in the williams garage after the race which was pretty bad. all the teams mechanics rallied round and put it out but as yet no news on injuries, I believe 4 people were taken to the medical centre, no news on severity and it looks like no one is missing thankfully. A sad end to a great race.
Voluntary Tanker Trash XL231 Lusty Lindy Lancashire section.
our blog http://victorxl231.blogspot.com/
User avatar
ianf

Re: F1 2012

Postby Tonka 617 on Sun 13 May 2012, 5:41 pm

Fire breaks out in the Williams garage http://www1.skysports.com/formula-1/news/12433/7754041/Fire-breaks-out-at-Williams, sad end to a brilliant win :(
User avatar
Tonka 617

Re: F1 2012

Postby timuss on Sun 13 May 2012, 9:52 pm

Tonka 617 wrote:Fire breaks out in the Williams garage http://www1.skysports.com/formula-1/news/12433/7754041/Fire-breaks-out-at-Williams, sad end to a brilliant win :(


Just watched the race and, logged onto facebook and saw this on there very sad :sad:
Canon 7D
Canon 40D
Sigma 18-200
Sigma 10-20
Canon 100-400 L IS
Icom ICR-2 Scanner
PSN: timuss
timuss

Re: F1 2012

Postby Ian G on Mon 14 May 2012, 8:33 pm

A40-BP wrote:All hail the Pastor-bator! Stunning drive. Best Spanish GP for a number of years!

7


Wondered how long it would be before someone came up with a moronic name for Maldonado.

Didn't think it was that good-a-race; there were the odd moments of excitement but wouldn't go so far to say it was the best Spanish GP for years - if Raikkonen and Alonso were closer in the final laps then that would have been better. Hats off to Maldonado for holding off Alonso how he did anyway and good to see a different name on the top of the podium. And on merit as well, drove a faultless race and definitely the class of the field yesterday.
www.iangarfield.co.uk
@iangarfield
flickr.com/iangarfield

He's not going to sell much ice cream at that speed!
User avatar
Ian G

Re: F1 2012

Postby DeanW on Fri 18 May 2012, 2:50 pm

Image

:grin:
User avatar
DeanW
UKAR Staff

Re: F1 2012

Postby LN Strike Eagle on Fri 18 May 2012, 2:53 pm

Image
"...for 'twas the 80s, and battery consumption was high."
User avatar
LN Strike Eagle
Big Cheese MkII

Re: F1 2012

Postby timuss on Fri 18 May 2012, 5:42 pm

They are brilliant :grin:
Canon 7D
Canon 40D
Sigma 18-200
Sigma 10-20
Canon 100-400 L IS
Icom ICR-2 Scanner
PSN: timuss
timuss

Re: F1 2012

Postby A40-BP on Sun 27 May 2012, 2:57 pm

Well done to Webber. So many drivers deserved that win! Also good to see Massa improving.

Must be noted Maldonado proving for a second time what kind of driver he is :loser:

7
With dumb bombs and retarded bomblets, why don't they just use stupid missiles?
User avatar
A40-BP

Re: F1 2012

Postby RoverDriver on Sun 27 May 2012, 3:18 pm

.
Last edited by RoverDriver on Sun 08 Jul 2012, 11:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
RoverDriver

Re: F1 2012

Postby Eelmoor on Sun 27 May 2012, 11:39 pm

Monaco !!! is it time is was consigned to Europes very own Revival meeting and move the current F1 cars to a track where you can overtake, you can go full speed, you can go slightly offline without hitting something...etc etc etc, yes I know it has history and everyone lamments at how good it is being there but its time has gone Im afraid...listening to the weekends build up was like listening to the so called football pundits who drool over Brazil every four years at the world cup and almost climax with excitement everytime the ball is passed by the team :whistle:

Thoughts anyone :whistle:
Live SBS streaming for the Farnborough area http://farnborough.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=rad
User avatar
Eelmoor

Re: F1 2012

Postby DerekF on Mon 28 May 2012, 12:00 pm

Dullest GP of the season so far. I was hoping the much predicted rain would arrive and spice things up a bit but sadly no.
User avatar
DerekF

Re: F1 2012

Postby Ian G on Mon 28 May 2012, 10:01 pm

Have to agree. I gave up sunbathing to watch the race :lol:

Seriously, I was hoping the rain would spice things up a bit, I was thinking the last 8 laps could mean the race is anyone's. Poor Vergne, making a wrong choice for inters at the end, lost what would have been a career-best 7th place. Amazing how Maldonado goes from being hero to zero. He really needs to tame his angst down, as Coulthard quite rightly said, there's no space for dangerous moves to show aggression like he seems to.

On another note, despite BBC only having done a few live races so far, I think their coverage has been brilliant so far. Saw a bit of sky coverage from a friend and wasn't all that impressed really. They weren't either, they only wanted to see live races and can't stand the coverage on sky. Roll on Canada (and Silverstone - going to Friday practice this year again!)
www.iangarfield.co.uk
@iangarfield
flickr.com/iangarfield

He's not going to sell much ice cream at that speed!
User avatar
Ian G

Re: F1 2012

Postby LN Strike Eagle on Mon 28 May 2012, 10:10 pm

Ian G wrote:Poor Vergne, making a wrong choice for inters at the end, lost what would have been a career-best 7th place.

His tyres were finished (he'd had them on since lap 17) and would never have made it to the finish, so he had to pit anyway. The gamble on the inters was one worth taking as he had no chance of points if it stayed dry.

Ted Kravitz on Sky claimed that he'd only run one compound of tyre and had to pit for the second compound, but that's not true - he started on the super soft and put the softs on at his stop.
"...for 'twas the 80s, and battery consumption was high."
User avatar
LN Strike Eagle
Big Cheese MkII

Re: F1 2012

Postby Wes_Howes on Mon 28 May 2012, 11:47 pm

Once you've worn the inters though, I thought it didn't matter about only using one compound :question:
User avatar
Wes_Howes

Re: F1 2012

Postby LN Strike Eagle on Mon 28 May 2012, 11:58 pm

Wes_Howes wrote:Once you've worn the inters though, I thought it didn't matter about only using one compound :question:

No, it doesn't, but he'd already used both compounds anyway, so he didn't have to worry about that rule (contrary to what Ted said on Sky). That was never a consideration for them - they'd just run the tyres as far as they were going to go and had to pit. With just 14 laps remaining, he needed some new tyres - he'd never reach the flag driving 14 laps on tyres that had "fallen off the cliff".

In that case, it was worth a gamble on the inters - he had no chance for points after the stop, even on slicks. Had the rain arrived 10 minutes earlier, he might have got himself well into the points or even on the podium.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/99949
"...for 'twas the 80s, and battery consumption was high."
User avatar
LN Strike Eagle
Big Cheese MkII

Re: F1 2012

Postby DanH on Tue 29 May 2012, 12:21 am

It was so boring I actually fell asleep towards the end of the race. Montreal is one of my favourite tracks so I'm really looking forward to the next race, lets just hope it isn't delayed by rain like it was last year.
Always seeking to lower the tone...
User avatar
DanH

Re: F1 2012

Postby Ian G on Tue 29 May 2012, 12:51 pm

LN Strike Eagle wrote:
Ian G wrote:Poor Vergne, making a wrong choice for inters at the end, lost what would have been a career-best 7th place.

His tyres were finished (he'd had them on since lap 17) and would never have made it to the finish, so he had to pit anyway. The gamble on the inters was one worth taking as he had no chance of points if it stayed dry.

Ted Kravitz on Sky claimed that he'd only run one compound of tyre and had to pit for the second compound, but that's not true - he started on the super soft and put the softs on at his stop.


Ah, didn't realise it was down to tyre wear. He changed on lap 71 though when the rain was at its most threatening. If he'd have stayed out a bit longer, I wonder if he could have put his car in all the right places and at least stayed in the points, at least he displayed a strong showing.
www.iangarfield.co.uk
@iangarfield
flickr.com/iangarfield

He's not going to sell much ice cream at that speed!
User avatar
Ian G

Re: F1 2012

Postby LN Strike Eagle on Tue 29 May 2012, 2:05 pm

I doubt it - once the tyres "fall off the cliff" the pace drops dramatically; Schumacher had no defence when his engine problems hit and I suspect JEV would have been equally as slow.

You also have to question whether or not he'd even be able to keep it out of the walls when he's skating around with no grip; the leaders were 6 seconds a lap slower and sliding a lot when the rain was falling. Imagine driving that on bald tyres?
"...for 'twas the 80s, and battery consumption was high."
User avatar
LN Strike Eagle
Big Cheese MkII

Re: F1 2012

Postby LN Strike Eagle on Mon 04 Jun 2012, 12:35 am

"...for 'twas the 80s, and battery consumption was high."
User avatar
LN Strike Eagle
Big Cheese MkII

Re: F1 2012

Postby DanO1978 on Mon 04 Jun 2012, 12:59 am

Fabulous little film, that :clap:
The name's Smythe. James St. John Smythe.
User avatar
DanO1978
UKAR Staff

Re: F1 2012

Postby Tonka 617 on Mon 04 Jun 2012, 1:29 am

Fantastic video, thanks for sharing it LN Strike Eagle :clap: :up:
User avatar
Tonka 617

Re: F1 2012

Postby Hammerhead on Mon 04 Jun 2012, 4:32 pm

I'm surprised no one has mentioned this... http://www.gpupdate.net/en/f1-news/2794 ... al-by-fia/
Hammerhead

Re: F1 2012

Postby Danny on Sun 10 Jun 2012, 7:21 pm

So the Beeb can't even provide live radio commentary for the GP - shame on you BBC. :down:
"Can you believe it? Chelsea will just not let go in the Champions League!"
User avatar
Danny

PreviousNext

Return to Off Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AndyXH558, Spock, tomcatforever and 2 guests