Spitfire Mk.I N3200 returns to Duxford (Split)

[hmeasures]

One of N3200s rather whistley arrival.

N3200 by Harry Measures, on Flickr

[FarnboroJohn]

Both the baby Spitfire pics are delightful, but I do wish they would put an individual letter on it.

John

[Ewart]

What a lovely way to return to Duxford.

FarnboroJohn the original N3200 doesn't have an individual letter on it in the photos I have seen of her.

[LN Strike Eagle]

Both the baby Spitfire pics are delightful, but I do wish they would put an individual letter on it.

John

It didn't have an individual letter on it - http://markonepartners.co.uk/coming-soon-n3200

[tommo999]

What a lovely way to return to Duxford.

FarnboroJohn the original N3200 doesn't have an individual letter on it in the photos I have seen of her.

I may be wrong but I believe P9374 originally had more codes than just 'J' but until they can ascertain for certain what then it will remain as it is?

[Jeff Hunt]

Can I add one of N3200s rather whistley arrival?

N3200 by Harry Measures, on Flickr

Very, very nice.

What is the current civil reg# of this aircraft please ?

Cheers,

Jeff

[tommo999]

Jeff - reg is G-CFGJ.

[FarnboroJohn]

Both the baby Spitfire pics are delightful, but I do wish they would put an individual letter on it.

John

It didn't have an individual letter on it - http://markonepartners.co.uk/coming-soon-n3200

Hands up, one day I will research first......

Falling on my sword now!

John

[sdad]

Both the baby Spitfire pics are delightful, but I do wish they would put an individual letter on it.

John

Why is it a "baby" Spitfire?

[LN Strike Eagle]

Both the baby Spitfire pics are delightful, but I do wish they would put an individual letter on it.

John

Why is it a "baby" Spitfire?

It's what the BBMF refer to their Mk.IIa as, and seems to have been adopted by people to describe all early marks of the type, like the Mk.I pictured in this thread.