Dan O'Hagan wrote:Wise up. Far less of a PR own goal if the RAF's airshow takes the blame, rather than the RAF's display teams. Don't swallow all that you read verbatim.

Dan O'Hagan wrote:Wise up. Far less of a PR own goal if the RAF's airshow takes the blame, rather than the RAF's display teams. Don't swallow all that you read verbatim.
Spotty_Jag wrote:Dan O'Hagan wrote:Wise up. Far less of a PR own goal if the RAF's airshow takes the blame, rather than the RAF's display teams. Don't swallow all that you read verbatim.
Totally correct. No way the Air Show Chairman or Station Commander would ruin their promotion prospects by pointing the finger of blame at their Duty Holder chain of command, or throw the Red Arrows under the bus. It was obvious that the Facebook video featuring the Wing Commander saying it was "his decision" is rubbish, as he's not the Flying Display Director first and foremost, just the spokeperson for the station. I think given how open and honest Peter is on the forums/social media he would have said if it was their decision. I think the RAF top brass are happily letting Cosford's staff take for fall for the Red Arrows issues.
When the F-22 stopped its display at RIAT last year, about the same happened at UKAR. Well, actually the Yanks were even slated for getting their spare airborne for a display at Duxford, instead of using it for a second go at Fairford.davidjones533 wrote:If the situation was reversed and it was the Italian, then there would not be this level of venom directed at the team. Some people seem to have a real hatred of our servicemen and a need for continual tabloid sensationalism which I for one do not understand.
scottspencer wrote:Anyone happen to note the reds registrations?
borismorris wrote: Did the Tornado manage to avoid Albrighton?
capercaillie wrote:borismorris wrote: Did the Tornado manage to avoid Albrighton?
Just on that point alone, it clearly performed a half Cuban over the edge of Albrighton, over the sports club/roses place, so not only did it not avoid the town, it performed aeros there.![]()
Wherever the directive came from, its a sad state of affairs its attracted so much negativity, and detracted from a very good little show.![]()
Are we going to see Yeovilton, Limington and Ilchester avoided in a few weeks time? The Reds displaying on an axis over Speckington?
Yeovilton, Fairford. But what about Biggin Hill - surely there's no way they can display there now?
scottspencer wrote:Lol, managed to get them if anyone needs them.
kianelle wrote:I live in area so decided not to go into show .I wanted a picture of B-52 approaching airfield so walked from my house around to end off runway A464 .I absolutely say that nobody was aloud to park roadside or stand anywhere in or around air display line it was completely cleared ..I decided to walk down burn hill road road which was closed to all traffic .In the field down burn hill road is were most people were being directed by police into a safe area ..I'm not sure if farmer who owns field agreed but that were they were told they could stand ..so u now have a completely safe zone of all traffic and people in and around air display line so imagine surprise when reds did display directly over very busy road (A464) and all the people sat in fields .I'm struggling to see how displaying over busy road and over people is safer than a area free from roads and people .
scottspencer wrote:XX227
XX242
XX177
XX245
XX204
XX311
XX244
XX319
XX323
Dan O'Hagan wrote:kianelle wrote:I live in area so decided not to go into show .I wanted a picture of B-52 approaching airfield so walked from my house around to end off runway A464 .I absolutely say that nobody was aloud to park roadside or stand anywhere in or around air display line it was completely cleared ..I decided to walk down burn hill road road which was closed to all traffic .In the field down burn hill road is were most people were being directed by police into a safe area ..I'm not sure if farmer who owns field agreed but that were they were told they could stand ..so u now have a completely safe zone of all traffic and people in and around air display line so imagine surprise when reds did display directly over very busy road (A464) and all the people sat in fields .I'm struggling to see how displaying over busy road and over people is safer than a area free from roads and people .
Don't UKAR rules stipulate posts must be in clear, legible English?