Dan O'Hagan wrote:"Saleemrama":Joined:Fri 11 Aug 2017, 2:40 pmMost active topic:Where has XH558 thread gone?
(7 Posts / 87.50% of user’s posts)
"Neverfuel":Last visited:Sun 13 Aug 2017, 3:42 pm
Case in point.
Dan O'Hagan wrote:"Saleemrama":Joined:Fri 11 Aug 2017, 2:40 pmMost active topic:Where has XH558 thread gone?
(7 Posts / 87.50% of user’s posts)
"Neverfuel":Last visited:Sun 13 Aug 2017, 3:42 pm
disgruntled wrote:speedbird2639 wrote:Is disgruntled, Neverfuels new user name?
That was my immediate thought as well!
Pathetic.
No this is an individual that welcomes cross examination and difficult questions but expects the "feet to the fire" to be expected on both sides.
In true Dan style I will go over the points very slowly one last time.
1) The present focus of discussion was about the most recent accounts and the amount of money spent on aircrew.
2) A random post suggesting a figure PER FLIGHT was then put up. Whilst this may be true or not it had absolutely no relevance to the current topic being debated.
3) Dan jumped on this and then hypothesised about how much money that was. Now as I mentioned this had absolutely no relevance to the current ongoing discussion about the most recent accounts so Dan was either
a) lacking in the social skills needed to keep up with the discussion and make a valid point.
b) just so egotistical that he felt he needed to be connected to further "scandal"
Or
c) deliberately using the opportunity to use irrelevant "facts" to make wild hypotheses in an attempt to cloud the issue or mislead the readers. As I said - tacitly inferring that that amount was still being paid.
I have no idea who neverfuels is but I did end up feeling sorry for him and the way he was bullied. The immediate reaction for Dan and some others is to assume that anyone who pulls him up on a point is the guardian angel of VttS.
What I am however is a serviceman with 28 years experience who's primary role is public duties and engagement. I'll come on to comments in another post about how "embarrassing" the RAFAT are because someone dared to have a baby in the relevant thread. If I can be bothered
Bluebird Mike wrote:No need to lock a thread because of one individual. 'disgruntled' and Dan were asked to take it private, yet 'disgruntled' is carrying the specific argument on- so it is the user who needs moderating, not the whole thread.
Dan O'Hagan wrote:"Saleemrama":Joined:Fri 11 Aug 2017, 2:40 pmMost active topic:Where has XH558 thread gone?
(7 Posts / 87.50% of user’s posts)
"Neverfuel":Last visited:Sun 13 Aug 2017, 3:42 pm
MicrolightDriver wrote:Hopefully some positive news for XH558 on Friday, and at least some new information to save people poring over year-old data which describes a situation and org. structure greatly changed in the interim.
Saleemrama wrote:Dan O'Hagan wrote:"Saleemrama":Joined:Fri 11 Aug 2017, 2:40 pmMost active topic:Where has XH558 thread gone?
(7 Posts / 87.50% of user’s posts)
"Neverfuel":Last visited:Sun 13 Aug 2017, 3:42 pm
Case in point.
Xm657 wrote:It's neither in this case as Neverfuel has resurfaced a few posts ago. Now whether he has multiple accounts to swell the numbers of VttST defenders, I dont know...
Which means another plunge of money needed. Can they afford that in the financial situation they seem to be in nowadays?XR219 wrote:XH558 is not out of fuel, at least not in the sense of the implication that more can't be taken on board if needed.
pbeardmore wrote:....PS it seems strange to include the value of the airframe youi are there to look after as a fixed asset. After all, its not realy an asset as, if you sell it, you have nothing to look after........
vulcan558 wrote:Some good comments over on the vtts forums,
This ones intresting.
http://www.vulcantothesky.org/smf/index ... 4#msg81444
The charity’s fixed assets comprise of Avro Vulcan XH558, its associated spare parts, ground equipment and tools, together with miscellaneous items