Jubilee flypast

Discuss all things 'aviation' that do not fit into a more appropriate forum
Post Reply
User avatar
stevebrodie
Posts: 792
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009, 9:11 am

Jubilee flypast

Post by stevebrodie »

Did anyone else notice the F35 on the right of the tanker having to put a lot of input into the horizontal stabs, same again when 4 with a voyager. Then a couple of tiffies were working hard in the 70. If they were closest to the centre could say its turbulence, but even one of the reds had the same issue. Maybe some turbulent air from the buildings below
Viper: Good morning, gentlemen, the temperature is 110 degrees

cg_341
Posts: 2601
Joined: Sun 09 Aug 2015, 1:39 pm

Re: Jubilee flypast

Post by cg_341 »

Looked like a fairly strong crosswind as one of the Hercs was well out of position looking at the head on footage!

FGR2
Posts: 2953
Joined: Mon 15 Sep 2008, 11:12 am

Re: Jubilee flypast

Post by FGR2 »

Haven’t seen the footage, there was a fair breeze at times along the Thames though.

baggy
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue 02 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm

Re: Jubilee flypast

Post by baggy »

Flew over me at Colchester Noticed the exact same thing. I just assumed modern self correcting flight controls. Probably no pilot input. Would I be right in assuming that if it wasn’t for a microchip these planes wouldn’t fly anyway

User avatar
CJS
Posts: 8883
Joined: Thu 15 Jul 2010, 3:30 pm
Location: A small town just outside Bristol...

Re: Jubilee flypast

Post by CJS »

If it wasn't for a lot of things (pilot, wings etc...). Pretty sure there have been complex computers on aircraft now for a while that are needed for the aircraft to fly. In the Typhoon for example, there's a computer directly behind the cockpit. I'm no expert, but I'm guessing the plane's going nowhere if that shuts down!
Buy the sky and sell the sky and lift your arms up to the sky and ask the sky"

User avatar
Archer
Posts: 233
Joined: Wed 06 May 2009, 10:02 am
Contact:

Re: Jubilee flypast

Post by Archer »

It will go somewhere.... I suspect down!

User avatar
capercaillie
Posts: 9382
Joined: Mon 01 Sep 2008, 3:04 pm
Location: Leominster

Re: Jubilee flypast

Post by capercaillie »

baggy wrote:
Fri 03 Jun 2022, 9:24 am
Flew over me at Colchester Noticed the exact same thing. I just assumed modern self correcting flight controls. Probably no pilot input. Would I be right in assuming that if it wasn’t for a microchip these planes wouldn’t fly anyway
Not sure about a microchip, but if you put a whole potato up the exhaust they don't start apparently!
"The surrogate voice of st24"

My flickr photos https://www.flickr.com/photos/146673712@N06/

User avatar
hunterxf382
Posts: 1700
Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2008, 9:36 pm
Location: West Midlands
Contact:

Re: Jubilee flypast

Post by hunterxf382 »

Certainly with Tornado (which I worked on), they had multiple onboard computers to control flight in what essentially is an unstable airframe. Main one; a secondary Back-Up; and a third Emergency one which had limited functions just to get down safely....
By designing an airframe to be naturally unstable - which the Americans did way back on the F-16; you get far more responsive control output as the computer takes many more inputs from sensors than the pilot could absorb and make decisions on, which then gives you a highly maneuverable aircraft which 'thinks' at an astonishing speed. I know technology marched on from the Tornado days, no doubt with the current equipment there would be the capability of much more. Pretty daunting stuff to work with - testing being complex to say the least ;)
Pete Buckingham
Volunteer in Aviation
Former RAF Engineer
http://hunterxf382.weebly.com/

Post Reply