A350

Discuss all things 'aviation' that do not fit into a more appropriate forum
Post Reply
User avatar
Kenny
Posts: 1682
Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2008, 10:25 am
Location: Stamford, Lincs
Contact:

A350

Post by Kenny »

The A350 has been rolled out of the Airbus factory in Toulouse. It took seven days to complete.

Image

http://www.airbus.com/newsevents/news-events-single/detail/first-a350-xwb-painting-completed-in-toulouse/#

Just doesn't look as big as the 777.

User avatar
chrisward123
Posts: 2585
Joined: Thu 12 Feb 2009, 12:10 pm
Location: Blackpool

Re: A350

Post by chrisward123 »

I do like that but looks like a 757!

Christian
Lakes Lightning Collection

User avatar
DerekF
Posts: 5213
Joined: Sun 07 Sep 2008, 7:54 am
Location: Handforth, Cheshire, UK

Re: A350

Post by DerekF »

Kenny wrote:The A350 has been rolled out of the Airbus factory in Toulouse. It took seven days to complete.


That's very impressive. I think it may taken a bit longer than that though.

Edit: The painting took 7 days apparently.

parsley
UKAR Supporter
Posts: 1002
Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2008, 10:49 pm
Location: Just east of a large airport in West London

Re: A350

Post by parsley »

Kenny wrote:The A350 has been rolled out of the Airbus factory in Toulouse. It took seven days to complete.

Image

http://www.airbus.com/newsevents/news-events-single/detail/first-a350-xwb-painting-completed-in-toulouse/#

Just doesn't look as big as the 777.



Isn't this model the -900 though which is meant to compete with the 777-200 ?

Epic Formacion

Re: A350

Post by Epic Formacion »

It just don't look right to me. Won't be rushing to get a 350 trip in a hurry.

User avatar
tankbuster
Posts: 2316
Joined: Sun 17 Jul 2011, 5:04 pm

Re: A350

Post by tankbuster »

I think it's stunning; well someone has to like it
Trevor C
recent and not so recent pictures here https://trevorc28a.wixsite.com/trevspics

User avatar
bigfatron
Posts: 918
Joined: Mon 06 Jul 2009, 11:40 am

Re: A350

Post by bigfatron »

tankbuster wrote:I think it's stunning; well someone has to like it


I'm with you on that. And the black framed windows remind me of the Space Shuttle. Nose profile is a bit Dreamliner-y but overall it rather looks the part i'd say.

User avatar
effects
Posts: 1275
Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2008, 4:36 pm
Location: 1.5 miles west of 06 EGLF

Re: A350

Post by effects »

Here is the dims--800 L 198 ft W 213 ft
-900 219 ft W 213
-1000 242 ft W 213

for comparison 777-200 L209 W199 or 212
-300 242 W199 or 212
Nikon P900 (Sony DSC-HX400V, Sony DSC-HX300 and DSC-H2 retired)

User avatar
phreakf4
Posts: 2821
Joined: Mon 01 Sep 2008, 9:42 pm

Re: A350

Post by phreakf4 »

So we can expect to see that on the Trade Days at next year's Farnborough then.....

I agree it looks "wrong", mostly because the photographer has used a very short focal length which makes the nose look too long and the tail surfaces look too small.
nothing is confirmed at a show until its u/c hits the tarmac or it is running in for its display.....

User avatar
swingy
Posts: 1375
Joined: Fri 05 Sep 2008, 6:20 pm

Re: A350

Post by swingy »

I actually quite like it.

foxfour
Posts: 849
Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2008, 11:48 pm

Re: A350

Post by foxfour »

I hope the seats are rather more comfortable than a 777 !

Concorde216
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat 11 Jul 2009, 3:06 pm

Re: A350

Post by Concorde216 »

I actually think it looks great. One thing that always impresses me with Airbus is the shape of the wing, which is more distinctive than the Boeing ones.

The bigger question is whether it will be able to be at Paris in June...my feeling is that it wont, however, if it does, then it will be extremely tight for time to do so.

One forum I went on a while likened the nose to the 146 and I can kind of see there point of view.

Foxfour - I hope the seats are more comfortable than on the Boeing 777. As much as I like the aircraft, the seats are not great for 12/13 hour flight in economy!

TomTwin
Posts: 1933
Joined: Fri 11 Jun 2010, 7:37 pm

Re: A350

Post by TomTwin »

Concorde216 wrote:The bigger question is whether it will be able to be at Paris in June...my feeling is that it wont, however, if it does, then it will be extremely tight for time to do so.


A friend who works on the A350 text me this morning saying it would be there. Sorry I haven't got anything more thorough than that but that's all I know! :biggrin:

User avatar
Red Dragon
Posts: 1721
Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2008, 6:56 pm

Re: A350

Post by Red Dragon »

Concorde216 wrote:Foxfour - I hope the seats are more comfortable than on the Boeing 777. As much as I like the aircraft, the seats are not great for 12/13 hour flight in economy!


In a few weeks I have a Brisbane > Singapore > Dubai > Manchester flight in a 777 Economy seat :sad: Thankfully there's a free bar on the flight :heyhey:

User avatar
iaint
UKAR Staff
Posts: 1201
Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2008, 10:09 pm
Location: Leics

Re: A350

Post by iaint »

TomTwin wrote:
Concorde216 wrote:The bigger question is whether it will be able to be at Paris in June...my feeling is that it wont, however, if it does, then it will be extremely tight for time to do so.


A friend who works on the A350 text me this morning saying it would be there. Sorry I haven't got anything more thorough than that but that's all I know! :biggrin:


That's different what I've seen/heard that say the A350 won't be at Paris (static/flying) although a possibility of an appearance exists through a 'conveniently' timed test flight allowing for a flypast...

Either way, First Flight is the first hurdle...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/iainthomson84/

End of Message, End of Broadcast

Concorde216
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat 11 Jul 2009, 3:06 pm

Re: A350

Post by Concorde216 »

Take a look at the video below of the roll out from the paint bay. I think it looks the biz seeing it at all angles :biggrin:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dgOqHVCFk0

User avatar
boff180
UKAR Staff
Posts: 9852
Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2008, 2:28 pm
Location: Solihull
Contact:

Re: A350

Post by boff180 »

The looks are very distinctive...

Looks like the love child of a Boeing 787 and a Embraer 190! :grin:

User avatar
Monty
Posts: 999
Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2008, 2:53 pm

Re: A350

Post by Monty »

Red Dragon wrote:
Concorde216 wrote:Foxfour - I hope the seats are more comfortable than on the Boeing 777. As much as I like the aircraft, the seats are not great for 12/13 hour flight in economy!


In a few weeks I have a Brisbane > Singapore > Dubai > Manchester flight in a 777 Economy seat :sad: Thankfully there's a free bar on the flight :heyhey:


I might be strange here but I actually didn't find the seats in 777 economy that bad last time i flew on one. Will get plenty of time to re-evaluate that on my four 12 hour legs to from Sydney over the summer :snack:
Canon EOS 50D
Canon 18-55mm IS
Canon 70-300mm IS USM F-4.0/5.6

1094 (Ely) Sqn ATC

User avatar
boff180
UKAR Staff
Posts: 9852
Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2008, 2:28 pm
Location: Solihull
Contact:

Re: A350

Post by boff180 »

Depends on the operator.

American Airlines 777 Economy seats are wide and have plenty of leg room... we flew out to Texas on one in October, was a great flight.

The return trip was on a British Airways 777.... the seats were much narrower and naff all leg room. After that experience I won't fly British Airways if I can avoid it.

Andy

User avatar
Agg
UKAR Staff
Posts: 1975
Joined: Tue 05 May 2009, 11:25 am
Location: Norway

Re: A350

Post by Agg »

Another generic airliner, people complain about the looks of the F-35 and so on, but this is just a tube with wings :P

Not my cup of tea ;)

User avatar
Red Dragon
Posts: 1721
Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2008, 6:56 pm

Re: A350

Post by Red Dragon »

boff180 wrote:Depends on the operator.

American Airlines 777 Economy seats are wide and have plenty of leg room... we flew out to Texas on one in October, was a great flight.

The return trip was on a British Airways 777.... the seats were much narrower and naff all leg room. After that experience I won't fly British Airways if I can avoid it.

Andy


I'm flying with Emirates, the legroom is ok (I'm 6' 4") but I have decided on the return leg to sit at the back where there are just two seats not three, so my missus and I can move about in our seats without disturbing the guy sitting next to us.

I have to admit though that of all seats I found the seats and leg room on Emirates economy A-380 to be the best and that Airbus seats are better for me!

User avatar
Fournier
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon 01 Sep 2008, 2:44 am
Location: Welwyn

Re: A350

Post by Fournier »

chrisward123 wrote:I do like that but looks like a 757!

Christian


Loosely.

Post Reply