Sorry, I don't buy that. Kinloss Spaceport must be a far more realistic a proposition than Concorde return to flight, because it has the potential to earn a huge profit. A single Concorde does not!
Who said anything about stopping at one...........
Get Concorde flying again!
Re: Get Concorde flying again!
Sea Hornet said:
Who said anything about stopping at one...........
Who said anything about stopping at one...........
I am not a loony... I used to be, but I think I am better now...
Re: Get Concorde flying again!
Mad Dan wrote:Sea Hornet said:Sorry, I don't buy that. Kinloss Spaceport must be a far more realistic a proposition than Concorde return to flight, because it has the potential to earn a huge profit. A single Concorde does not!
Who said anything about stopping at one...........
...Now, you've got me worried...!
And as the smart ship grew,
In stature, grace and hue,
In shadowy silent distance grew the iceberg too....
In stature, grace and hue,
In shadowy silent distance grew the iceberg too....
-
Pen Pusher
- Posts: 7140
- Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2008, 6:34 pm
- Location: St Ives, Cambs
Re: Get Concorde flying again!
Considering the compensation culture we live in now would BAE/British Airways/Rolls-Royce etc. who would have to be on board (no pun intended) for a Concorde to fly, allow passengers to be carried in case something catastrophic happened and they get sued?.
Brian
Brian
Re: Get Concorde flying again!
It's very, very doubtful. RR won't support the engines.