aknott68 wrote:Yet again another ridiculous post by Ruislip rustler. What part of my post suggested any criticism of Phil or anyone else involved in arranging the night. What it of my original post didn't yo bother to read. My question was very simple what changed the risk profile for this event that meant engine runs weren't enabled and what means that risk will be mitigated in order to be confident engine runs will occur in october
Not difficult to grasp if to y do t feel that you are able to answer it just say that rather than trying to be argumentative
For the very last time:
I read all of it and then re-read it, just to make sure I'd noted all the points you made. I've done the same with this after taking a little time to moderate my reply.
So, in order:
Who said you were criticising?
The reason for the change has nothing to do with you and we have no obligation to tell you. As far as I can see, nobody else is droning on at great length about the change to the 'risk profile' on Thursday night. I'll repeat the fact that we hope it's one-off. If it isn't, we'll tell you.
What else can we do? We'll put our case and somebody will make a decision - you can be very confident of that.
I don't understand the first part of your last sentence.
I also note that due to illness, you didn't attend this event so weren't actually disadvantaged by the decision to not run engines. And you may not be if the decision is reversed for October. #JustSaying
This, I promise, will be my last comment.