USMC F-35B Down

Discuss all things 'aviation' that do not fit into a more appropriate forum
Post Reply
User avatar
Abbo46
Posts: 858
Joined: Thu 16 Aug 2018, 10:54 am
Location: Suffolk

USMC F-35B Down

Post by Abbo46 »

First crash of an F-35 this afternoon.

[tweet]https://twitter.com/LucasFoxNews/status/1045720680174690311[/tweet]

AndrewW
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun 26 Oct 2008, 11:08 pm

Re: USMC F-35B Down

Post by AndrewW »

Link: https://www.stripes.com/news/us/f-35b-l ... a-1.549535

Pilot safely ejected, thankfully

User avatar
Brevet Cable
Posts: 13727
Joined: Tue 05 Mar 2013, 12:13 pm

Re: USMC F-35B Down

Post by Brevet Cable »

Only a 'C' to go now, then.....

Have ISIL / AQ / the Taliban claimed responsibility & have the Americans blamed Russia yet?
Tôi chỉ đặt cái này ở đây để giữ cho người điều hành bận rộn
아직도 숨어있다

User avatar
Tmyers123
Posts: 1069
Joined: Thu 03 May 2018, 6:05 pm
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: USMC F-35B Down

Post by Tmyers123 »

Brevet Cable wrote:Only a 'C' to go now, then.....

Have ISIL / AQ / the Taliban claimed responsibility & have the Americans blamed Russia yet?


You sure?

User avatar
toom317
UKAR Supporter
Posts: 2013
Joined: Tue 02 Sep 2008, 11:02 am

Re: USMC F-35B Down

Post by toom317 »

Nice of them to use a pic of an RAF airframe in that link.
"Nice pics mate" comments only! No criticism please.

Equipment: Camera, Lens, Goretex Y fronts.

User avatar
Brevet Cable
Posts: 13727
Joined: Tue 05 Mar 2013, 12:13 pm

Re: USMC F-35B Down

Post by Brevet Cable »

Tmyers123 wrote:
Brevet Cable wrote:Only a 'C' to go now, then.....

You sure?

Unless I'm mistaken, they lost an 'A' when the engine lunched itself but they haven't lost a 'C' yet.
Tôi chỉ đặt cái này ở đây để giữ cho người điều hành bận rộn
아직도 숨어있다

User avatar
Tmyers123
Posts: 1069
Joined: Thu 03 May 2018, 6:05 pm
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: USMC F-35B Down

Post by Tmyers123 »

Brevet Cable wrote:
Tmyers123 wrote:
Brevet Cable wrote:Only a 'C' to go now, then.....

You sure?

Unless I'm mistaken, they lost an 'A' when the engine lunched itself but they haven't lost a 'C' yet.


Completely forgot about that. Let’s just hope there aren’t any more accidents.

Joe Spares
Posts: 182
Joined: Wed 30 Sep 2009, 7:20 pm
Location: Tewkesbury Glos

Re: USMC F-35B Down

Post by Joe Spares »

...although they nearly lost a C last month when one ate a refuelling drouge, writing off the engine....

Eagle85
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun 25 Feb 2018, 5:48 pm

Re: USMC F-35B Down

Post by Eagle85 »

100k+ flying hours and twelve years and this is the first actual crash, not withstanding the aforementioned engine failure and refuelling near miss and the nose gear problem recently. Surely that has got to be one of the greatest achievements with a new jet? Comparible with predecessors... How many hours did the Phantom/F-16/Harrier/Tornado/F-18 etc do before a total loss? Would be interesting to compare. An unbiased comparison would be favourable of course without all of the nay sayers, haters and armchair experts jumping on the old querty...

vulcan558
Posts: 1117
Joined: Sat 06 Oct 2012, 9:45 pm

Re: USMC F-35B Down

Post by vulcan558 »

Eagle85 wrote:100k+ flying hours and twelve years and this is the first actual crash, not withstanding the aforementioned engine failure and refuelling near miss and the nose gear problem recently. Surely that has got to be one of the greatest achievements with a new jet? Comparible with predecessors... How many hours did the Phantom/F-16/Harrier/Tornado/F-18 etc do before a total loss? Would be interesting to compare. An unbiased comparison would be favourable of course without all of the nay sayers, haters and armchair experts jumping on the old querty...

100k flying hours for the f35B. Where do you get that figure from.

User avatar
Brevet Cable
Posts: 13727
Joined: Tue 05 Mar 2013, 12:13 pm

Re: USMC F-35B Down

Post by Brevet Cable »

Eagle85 wrote:Comparible with predecessors... How many hours did the Phantom/F-16/Harrier/Tornado/F-18 etc do before a total loss? Would be interesting to compare. An unbiased comparison would be favourable of course without all of the nay sayers, haters and armchair experts jumping on the old querty...

Different times, different technology, different testing & training regimes.....any comparison would be as valid as comparing ( non-combat ) losses between WW1-era & WW2-era aircraft, or 1950/60s aircraft with 1980/90s ones.

The F-35 aircraft have had a history of engine & airframe issues, haven't they?
Tôi chỉ đặt cái này ở đây để giữ cho người điều hành bận rộn
아직도 숨어있다

User avatar
Brevet Cable
Posts: 13727
Joined: Tue 05 Mar 2013, 12:13 pm

Re: USMC F-35B Down

Post by Brevet Cable »

vulcan558 wrote:100k flying hours for the f35B. Where do you get that figure from.

https://www.f35.com/news/detail/lockheed-martin-f-35s-surpass-100000-flight-hours-system-development-and-de
100k hours for the whole F-35 fleet, not just the 'B' model.
Tôi chỉ đặt cái này ở đây để giữ cho người điều hành bận rộn
아직도 숨어있다

User avatar
boff180
UKAR Staff
Posts: 9856
Joined: Sun 31 Aug 2008, 2:28 pm
Location: Solihull
Contact:

Re: USMC F-35B Down

Post by boff180 »

100k+ flying hours and twelve years and this is the first actual crash, not withstanding the aforementioned engine failure and refuelling near miss and the nose gear problem recently. Surely that has got to be one of the greatest achievements with a new jet? Comparible with predecessors... How many hours did the Phantom/F-16/Harrier/Tornado/F-18 etc do before a total loss? Would be interesting to compare. An unbiased comparison would be favourable of course without all of the nay sayers, haters and armchair experts jumping on the old querty…


Seems to be an assumption that it was a problem with the aircraft that caused this. Any assessment is skewed until causes of crash are categorised for each type.

No cause has been announced.

Could quite easily have been pilot error or a bad bird strike.

An example being the Rafale, of the 5 aircraft that have been lost - 4 were due to pilot error and the 5th's reason has yet to be announced.

Post Reply